Business Rules and resisting the commoditization of process
Interesting note in this EDS blog on the commoditization of process. What is interesting to me is that all this discussion is around the flow, management and performance being standardized or commoditized. If you use these processes, and so do your competitors, how can you still differentiate yourself? Well you could make sure the business rules that drive the decision points in the process are unique and a match for your corporate perspective/attitude/philosophy. Using a business rules management system you can inject automated decisioning into the processes, whether you run them, someone else runs them or you use a standard one. Not only will this give you efficiency gains, by eliminating manual decision-making steps, it will let you easily change the decision policies within your process maximizing agility, allowing for personalization and ensuring that your customers still feel they are dealing with you, not with some generic enterprise.
I wrote on this topic a couple of times previously here, in the context of Business Process outsourcing - http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2005/11/business_proces_4.html and http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2005/10/outsourcing_and.html.

This is an excellent point. For some time now I've had the same feeling about so called "best practices": If everyone in your industry is using the same best practices as you are," aren't they really more like "average practices?" A BRMS would allow you to gain an edge over your competition because it would add flexibility, precision and standardized procedures to your decision-making processes--whether they are customer facing or internal.
Posted by: Curt Hall | December 15, 2005 at 01:38 PM
What is most important is what are the techniques an organization uses to run its business in the most apt way? So you need to lay down your rule books and move accordingly. For outsourcing voice, chat, email or back-office support, visit the website http://callcenter.ramshyam.com
Posted by: Call Center India | June 26, 2006 at 01:08 AM